Open Access
Neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and a dosimetric factor for predicting symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Author(s) -
Lee Yun Hee,
Choi HoonSik,
Jeong Hojin,
Kang Ki Mun,
Song Jin Ho,
Lee Won Sup,
Lee GyeongWon,
Song HaaNa,
Kim HoonGu,
Kang Myoung Hee,
Rhee Dong Yoon,
Jeong Bae Kwon
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the clinical respiratory journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.789
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1752-699X
pISSN - 1752-6981
DOI - 10.1111/crj.12660
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation pneumonitis , chemoradiotherapy , lung cancer , lymphocyte , radiation therapy , pneumonitis , oncology , lung
Abstract Objectives To identify the factors that predict the progression of radiological radiation pneumonitis (RP) to symptomatic RP, and to evaluate the usefulness of the neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of RP severity and prognosis in stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 61 patients treated between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical data, laboratory findings and treatment parameters were analyzed to determine the predictive factors associated with progression from radiological RP to symptomatic RP. Results Forty‐seven patients (77%) exhibited radiological RP at a median of 78 days after radiation therapy (RT) completion, and 15 (32%) of these patients developed symptomatic RP. The interval between RT completion and radiological RP presentation was shorter in patients who progressed to symptomatic RP ( P = .001); progression was highly probable if this latency period was ≤2 months ( P = .002). Stage and RT technique correlated with symptomatic RP development ( P = .046 and P = .046, respectively). Among dosimetric factors, a V 20 (defined as the lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy) of >30% was the most significant predictor of symptomatic RP ( P = .001). The NLR and C‐reactive protein level at radiological RP were higher in patients who developed symptomatic RP ( P = .067 and P = .012, respectively). On multivariate analysis, a V 20 >30% and an NLR at radiological RP >6 were associated with symptomatic RP development. Conclusion The NLR at radiological RP is a useful biomarker for predicting symptomatic RP development after CCRT in stage III NSCLC patients.