Premium
Comparison of amplitude‐mode ultrasound versus air displacement plethysmography for assessing body composition changes following participation in a structured weight‐loss programme in women
Author(s) -
Schoenfeld Brad J.,
Aragon Alan A.,
Moon Jordan,
Krieger James W.,
TiryakiSonmez Gul
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12355
Subject(s) - medicine , plethysmograph , ultrasound , lean body mass , body mass index , linear regression , adipose tissue , weight loss , physical therapy , aerobic exercise , obesity , cardiology , body weight , statistics , mathematics , radiology
Summary The purpose of this study was to compare body composition changes as measured by A‐mode ultrasound ( US ) versus a criterion densitometry‐based measure, air displacement plethysmography ( ADP ), over a 4‐week weight‐loss protocol in healthy, non‐obese young women. Twenty healthy, young female volunteers were provided with customized dietary plans for the length of the study intended to facilitate a 500 calorie‐a‐day deficit. Subjects also performed 3 h a week of supervised aerobic exercise. Per cent fat mass and lean body mass were obtained via ADP and US both pre‐ and postintervention. Pretesting, post‐testing and delta data for %fat resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y ‐intercept no different than zero ( P <0·05). Similar to %fat values, pretesting, post‐testing and delta data for fat‐free mass resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y ‐intercept no different than zero ( P <0·05) with the exception of the delta for slope (0·39, P = 0·04). The current findings indicate that US can provide a similar degree of accuracy for tracking group‐based fat loss in women compared to ADP . Given the low‐cost relative to DXA and ADP , researchers and practitioners therefore can consider US as a viable option for monitoring group‐based changes in body fat over time.