Premium
Comparison of amplitude‐mode ultrasound versus air displacement plethysmography for assessing body composition changes following participation in a structured weight‐loss programme in women
Author(s) -
Schoenfeld Brad J.,
Aragon Alan A.,
Moon Jordan,
Krieger James W.,
TiryakiSonmez Gul
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12355
Subject(s) - medicine , plethysmograph , ultrasound , lean body mass , body mass index , linear regression , adipose tissue , weight loss , physical therapy , aerobic exercise , obesity , cardiology , body weight , statistics , mathematics , radiology
Summary The purpose of this study was to compare body composition changes as measured by A‐mode ultrasound ( US ) versus a criterion densitometry‐based measure, air displacement plethysmography ( ADP ), over a 4‐week weight‐loss protocol in healthy, non‐obese young women. Twenty healthy, young female volunteers were provided with customized dietary plans for the length of the study intended to facilitate a 500 calorie‐a‐day deficit. Subjects also performed 3 h a week of supervised aerobic exercise. Per cent fat mass and lean body mass were obtained via ADP and US both pre‐ and postintervention. Pretesting, post‐testing and delta data for %fat resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y ‐intercept no different than zero ( P <0·05). Similar to %fat values, pretesting, post‐testing and delta data for fat‐free mass resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y ‐intercept no different than zero ( P <0·05) with the exception of the delta for slope (0·39, P = 0·04). The current findings indicate that US can provide a similar degree of accuracy for tracking group‐based fat loss in women compared to ADP . Given the low‐cost relative to DXA and ADP , researchers and practitioners therefore can consider US as a viable option for monitoring group‐based changes in body fat over time.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom