Premium
Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests in healthy recreationally active subjects
Author(s) -
Dideriksen Kasper,
Mikkelsen Ulla Ramer
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12283
Subject(s) - reproducibility , medicine , cycle ergometer , vo2 max , interval training , limits of agreement , physical therapy , cardiology , heart rate , nuclear medicine , mathematics , statistics , blood pressure
Summary Purpose Testing of the ventilatory threshold ( VT ) and maximal oxygen uptake ( VO 2 peak) is relevant for the evaluation of a range of training studies, clinical trials and cross‐sectional studies. Due to a possible learning effect, a familiarization test is often performed to increase test reproducibility. However, limited research has investigated this learning effect and reproducibility of maximal exercise testing. The most appropriate ways to determine VT and VO 2 peak are not clear, and this study evaluated two approaches ( V ‐slope and a combined method) for the determination of VT and five time‐averaging intervals (60, 30, 15, 10 and 5 s) for the determination of VO 2 peak to compare test results and reproducibility. Methods Thirteen recreational triathletes completed three identical incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests. The initial workload was 75 and 100 watt ( W ) for women and men, respectively, and the workload was increased by 4 W/10 s thereafter. No familiarization test was performed. Results VO 2 peak increased significantly as the time‐averaging interval became shorter (e.g. 5‐s interval 48·7 versus 60‐s interval 44·8 ml O 2 kg −1 min −1 ; overall P <0·001). All test results were similar for the three test rounds, indicating that repeated testing was not associated with any learning effect. The different VT measuring methods ( CV 7·6 versus 7·7%, P = 0·58) and VO 2 peak time‐averaging intervals ( CV 3·7–4·4%, P = 0·99) did not influence test reliability. Conclusions The reproducibility of VT and VO 2 peak was not affected by measuring methods and time‐averaging intervals. However, the time‐averaging intervals significantly affect the absolute VO 2 peak values. Furthermore, no learning effect of maximal cycle ergometer testing was observed.