z-logo
Premium
Comparison of two methods of assessing total body water at sea level and increasing high altitude
Author(s) -
Boos C. J.,
Holdsworth D. A.,
Hall D. P.,
Mellor A.,
O'Hara J.,
Woods D. R.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12121
Subject(s) - body water , medicine , altitude (triangle) , confidence interval , limiting , body weight , zoology , limits of agreement , effects of high altitude on humans , nuclear medicine , mathematics , anatomy , biology , mechanical engineering , geometry , engineering
Summary Fluid retention is a recognized feature of acute mountain sickness. However, accurate assessment of hydration, including the quantification of body water, has traditionally relied on expensive and non‐portable equipment limiting its utility in the field setting. We compared the assessment of total body water ( TBW ) and their relationship to total body weight using two non‐invasive methods using the NICa s single‐frequency bioimpedance analysis ( SF ‐ BIA ) system and the BodyStat QuadScan 4000 multifrequency BIA system ( MF ‐ BIA ). TBW measurements were performed at rest at sea level and at high altitude ( HA ) at 3833 m postexercise and at rest and thereafter at rest at 4450 m and 5129 m on 47 subjects. The average age was 34·5 ± 9·3 years with an age range of 21–54 years (70·2% male). There were strong correlations between TBW assessment with both methods at sea level ( r  = 0·90; 95% CI 0·78–0·95: P <0·0001) and at HA ( r  = 0·92; 0·89–0·94: P <0·0001), however, TBW readings were 0·2 l and 1·91 l lower, respectively, with the NIC aS. There was a stronger correlation between TBW and body weight with the QuadScan ( r  = 0·91; P <0·0001) than with the NIC aS ( r  = 0·83; P <0·0001). The overall agreement between the two TBW methods was good, but the 95% confidence intervals around these agreements were relatively wide. We conclude that there was reasonable agreement between the two methods of BIA for TBW, but this agreement was lower at HA .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here