z-logo
Premium
Body composition assessment in overweight women: validation of air displacement plethysmography
Author(s) -
Wingfield Hailee L.,
SmithRyan Abbie E.,
Woessner Mary N.,
Melvin Malia N.,
Fultz Sarah N.,
Graff Rachel M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12067
Subject(s) - medicine , overweight , intraclass correlation , lean body mass , fat mass , nuclear medicine , plethysmograph , obesity , body adiposity index , dual energy x ray absorptiometry , body fat percentage , zoology , body weight , classification of obesity , bone mineral , clinical psychology , osteoporosis , biology , psychometrics
Summary Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of air displacement plethysmography ( ADP ) compared to a dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry ( DXA ) criterion for body composition measurement in overweight and obese women ( BMI  ≥ 25·0 kg m 2 ). Subjects/Methods Twenty‐four overweight and obese women (Mean ±  SD ; Age: 36·6 ± 12·0 years; Height: 166·4 ± 5·8 cm; Weight: 86·5 ± 14·2 kg; Body Fat: 38·5 ± 3·7%; BMI : 31·3 ± 5·5 kg m 2 ) were tested after an 8‐h fast. Fat mass ( FM ), fat‐free mass ( FFM ) and percent body fat (% BF ) were measured by ADP and compared to values determined by the DXA criterion. FFM from DXA was calculated as lean mass plus bone mineral content. A paired samples t‐test was used to test for significant differences in the body composition variables between methods. A one‐way ANOVA along with intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ), SEM ,% SEM and MD was used to represent reliability. Results Validity data comparing ADP and DXA demonstrated no significant difference in FM ( ADP ‐ DXA FM  = 0·99 kg; P  = 0·113), FFM (0·98 kg; P  = 0·115) and % BF (1·56%; P  = 0·540). Reliability data for ADP between the first and second trials showed no significant difference in FM ( P  = 0·168; ICC  = 0·994; SEM  = 0·668), FFM ( P  = 0·058; ICC  = 0·973; SEM  = 0·892) or % BF ( P  = 0·121; ICC  = 0·971; SEM  = 0·813). Conclusions For overweight and obese women, ADP was found to be a valid measure of FM , FFM and % BF when compared with DXA . The reliability of ADP was supported for all body composition variables.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom