z-logo
Premium
Ultrasound imaging of the serratus anterior muscle at rest and during contraction
Author(s) -
Talbott Nancy R.,
Witt Dexter W.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1111/cpf.12012
Subject(s) - medicine , intraclass correlation , ultrasound , sitting , limits of agreement , rest (music) , nuclear medicine , ultrasound imaging , cardiology , radiology , pathology , clinical psychology , psychometrics
Summary The purpose of this study is to describe a clinically feasible method for measuring the thickness of the serratus anterior (SA) muscle using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging ( RUSI ) and to determine the reliability of repeated measures of that method. An exploratory clinical measurement study using a test–retest methodology was utilized to determine the reliability of the measurements in a sample of 20 healthy subjects. While sitting with the arm flexed 120°, the SA of each subject was imaged at rest, during an active hold and while holding a three pound weight. On Day 1, images were repeated three times for each condition by the same examiner. On Day 2, Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 repeated the scans. Images were examined offline by Examiner 1 with SA thickness measured superior to the most distal rib in the image. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients ( ICC s) and Bland–Altman plots. The intra‐examiner reliability (same day) during rest, active hold and active hold with resistance was ICC 3,3  = 0·892; ICC 3,3  = 0·951; and ICC 3,3  = 0·869–0·971, respectively. Intra‐examiner reliability between days ranged from ICC 3,2  = 0·613 at rest to ICC 3,2  = 0·736 during active hold with resistance. Interexaminer reliability was moderate during active hold (ICC 2,2  = 0·526) and active hold with resistance (ICC 2,2  = 0·535) and poor during rest (ICC 2,2  = 0·425). This study demonstrates that SA thickness can be measured reliably using RUSI by the same examiner and suggests that active movements may increase that reliability.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here