z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Live reptile smuggling is predicted by trends in the legal exotic pet trade
Author(s) -
Stringham Oliver C.,
GarcíaDíaz Pablo,
Toomes Adam,
Mitchell Lewis,
Ross Joshua V.,
Cassey Phillip
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/conl.12833
Subject(s) - wildlife trade , biosecurity , wildlife , geography , popularity , poaching , biodiversity , ecology , biology , political science , law
Live animal smuggling presents a suite of conservation and biosecurity concerns, including the introduction of invasive species and diseases. Yet, understanding why certain species are smuggled over others, and predicting which species will be smuggled, remains relatively unexplored. Here, we compared the live reptile species illegally smuggled to Australia (75 species) to the legal trade of live reptile species in the United States. Almost all smuggled species were found in the legal US pet market (74 species), and we observed an average time lag of 5.6 years between a species first appearing in the United States and its subsequent detection in Australia. Using a Bayesian regression model, species popularity in the United States, and internationally, were positively associated with smuggling probability to Australia. Our findings give insight to the drivers of illegal wildlife trade and our predictive modelling approach provides a framework for anticipating future trends in wildlife smuggling.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here