Open AccessReconciling pest control, nature conservation, and recreation in coniferous forests
Author(s) -
Hagge Jonas,
Leibl Franz,
Müller Jörg,
Plechinger Martin,
Soutinho João Gonçalo,
Thorn Simon
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/conl.12615
Subject(s) - bark (sound) , recreation , biodiversity , agroforestry , pest control , salvage logging , logging , pest analysis , population , geography , forestry , biology , ecology , habitat , botany , demography , sociology , snag
Protected areas are not only crucial for biodiversity and natural processes but also for recreation. Although a benign neglect strategy of dealing with natural disturbances in protected areas is beneficial for nature, public debate on avoiding increased pest population growth has intensified. We evaluated the effect of mechanical pest control measures in decreasing populations of insect pests, maintaining nontarget biodiversity, retaining high recreational value, and keeping economic costs low. Debarking and bark scratching or gouging effectively prevented infestation of felled trees by European spruce bark beetles ( Ips typographus ) and controlled the beetles in recently infested trees. Bark scratching or gouging retained biodiversity at natural levels, whereas debarking decreased biodiversity by 54% with higher economic costs. The public rated bark‐gouged trees more positively than debarked trees. We thus urge authorities to promote bark scratching or gouging in the control of bark beetles in protected areas instead of salvage logging and debarking.