z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to White et al.: Providing Perspective on Ocean Conservation Targets
Author(s) -
O'Leary Bethan C.,
WintherJanson Marit,
Bainbridge John M.,
Aitken Jemma,
Hawkins Julie P.,
Roberts Callum M.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/conl.12380
Subject(s) - convention on biological diversity , marine protected area , marine conservation , perspective (graphical) , environmental resource management , environmental planning , geography , computer science , biodiversity , environmental science , ecology , biology , habitat , artificial intelligence
In O'Leary et al . (2016), we undertook a quantitative synthesis (rather than a true statistical meta‐analysis) of research to consider how much of the sea should be protected to achieve various conservation and management goals. We aimed to provide perspective on the appropriateness of global marine protected area coverage targets, particularly the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14/Convention on Biological Diversity goals to protect >10% of the sea by 2020. White et al . (2017) question the methodology of our approach, and we offer the following response.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here