Open AccessStatus and Trends in Global Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: Assessing Progress Toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14
Author(s) -
Shepherd Ellen,
MilnerGulland E.J.,
Knight Andrew T.,
Ling Matthew A.,
Darrah Sarah,
Soesbergen Arnout,
Burgess Neil D.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/conl.12320
Subject(s) - natural capital , biodiversity , ecosystem services , ecosystem , environmental resource management , natural resource economics , business , natural (archaeology) , geography , environmental planning , environmental science , ecology , economics , biology , archaeology
Abstract The Convention on Biological Diversity uses six indicators to assess progress toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14 (ecosystem services), leaving many elements of the target untracked. We identify 13 ecosystem services as directly essential for human well‐being, and select a set of 21 datasets as indicators of the state of natural capital underpinning those services, the benefits derived from them, and distribution of access to those benefits. Analysis of these indicators supports previous conclusions that there is no overall progress toward Target 14. Sixty percent of our “benefit” indicators have positive trends, whereas 86% of our “state” indicators show a decline in natural capital. This suggests that well‐being is increasing in the near‐term despite environmental degradation, and that unsustainable use of natural capital may fuel human development. As regulating services such as “soil fertility” continue to decline, however, it seems unlikely that this trend can continue without future negative impacts on humanity.