Premium
The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis
Author(s) -
Sobbe Linda,
Scheifele Edith,
Maienborn Claudia,
Ulrich Rolf
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
cognitive science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.498
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1551-6709
pISSN - 0364-0213
DOI - 10.1111/cogs.12709
Subject(s) - timeline , cognitive psychology , meta analysis , task (project management) , priming (agriculture) , psychology , dimension (graph theory) , salient , space (punctuation) , contrast (vision) , computer science , statistics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , biology , medicine , botany , germination , management , pure mathematics , economics , operating system
Abstract Several reaction time (RT) studies report faster responses when responses to temporal information are arranged in a spatially congruent manner than when this arrangement is incongruent. The resulting space–time congruency effect is commonly attributed to a culturally salient localization of temporal information along a mental timeline (e.g., a mental timeline that runs from left to right). The present study aims to provide a compilation of the published RT studies on this time–space association in order to estimate the size of its effect and the extent of potential publication bias in this field of research. In this meta‐analysis, three types of task are distinguished due to hitherto existing empirical findings. These findings suggest that the extent to which time is made relevant to the experimental task has a systematic impact on whether or not the mental timeline is activated. The results of this meta‐analysis corroborate these considerations: First, experiments that make time a task‐relevant dimension have a mean effect size of d = 0.46. Second, in experiments in which time is task irrelevant, the effect size does not significantly deviate from zero. Third, temporal priming studies have a surprisingly high mean effect size of d = 0.47, which, however, should be adjusted to d = 0.36 due to publication bias.