Premium
Processing of Numerical and Proportional Quantifiers
Author(s) -
Shikhare Sailee,
Heim Stefan,
Klein Elise,
Huber Stefan,
Willmes Klaus
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cognitive science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.498
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1551-6709
pISSN - 0364-0213
DOI - 10.1111/cogs.12219
Subject(s) - numerosity adaptation effect , quantifier (linguistics) , semantics (computer science) , truth value , computer science , mathematics , natural language processing , comprehension , artificial intelligence , cognition , psychology , programming language , neuroscience
Quantifier expressions like “ many ” and “ at least ” are part of a rich repository of words in language representing magnitude information. The role of numerical processing in comprehending quantifiers was studied in a semantic truth value judgment task, asking adults to quickly verify sentences about visual displays using numerical ( at least seven , at least thirteen , at most seven , at most thirteen ) or proportional ( many , few ) quantifiers. The visual displays were composed of systematically varied proportions of yellow and blue circles. The results demonstrated that numerical estimation and numerical reference information are fundamental in encoding the meaning of quantifiers in terms of response times and acceptability judgments. However, a difference emerges in the comparison strategies when a fixed external reference numerosity ( seven or thirteen ) is used for numerical quantifiers, whereas an internal numerical criterion is invoked for proportional quantifiers. Moreover, for both quantifier types, quantifier semantics and its polarity (positive vs. negative) biased the response direction (accept/reject). Overall, our results indicate that quantifier comprehension involves core numerical and lexical semantic properties, demonstrating integrated processing of language and numbers.