Premium
Burden of disease experienced by patients following a watch‐and‐wait policy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A qualitative study
Author(s) -
Pennings Alexander J.,
Kimman Merel L.,
Gielen Anke H. C.,
Beets Geerard L.,
Melenhorst Jarno,
Breukink Stephanie O.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.15838
Subject(s) - medicine , prom , quality of life (healthcare) , thematic analysis , qualitative research , feeling , patient reported outcome , physical therapy , family medicine , nursing , social psychology , social science , psychology , obstetrics , sociology
Abstract Aim Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used in routine cancer care to evaluate treatment and monitor symptoms, function and other aspects of quality of life (QoL). There is no suitable PROM for rectal cancer patients following a watch‐and‐wait (W&W) programme. Insight into patient experiences with this programme is an essential step in the development of a PROM. The aim of this qualitative study was to provide insights into the most important functional outcomes and QoL features experienced by patients during our W&W programme. Method Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who are enrolled in the W&W programme in the Netherlands were interviewed by telephone using a semistructured interview guide. All interviews were digitally audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data and identify themes and subthemes of importance to patients. Results Eighteen patients were interviewed (78% male, mean age 68 years, range 52–83 years). Physical complaints after treatment were present, most notably gastrointestinal problems, neuropathy and fatigue. Furthermore, patients were anxious about a possible recurrence, had a fear of surgery or a stoma, or were experiencing a general feeling of apprehension in daily life. Many patients had different coping mechanisms, such as acceptance, and there were few limitations in daily life. Conclusion We identified important functional outcomes, such as gastrointestinal complaints, fatigue and neuropathy, in patients who were enrolled in this W&W programme. Furthermore, an emotional burden and unmet needs were reported by these patients. These findings can be used to improve clinical practice and inform the development of a PROM.