z-logo
Premium
Financial and occupational impact of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer survivors
Author(s) -
Garfinkle Richard,
Ky Aurelie,
Singh Aashiyan,
Morin Nancy,
Ghitulescu Gabriela,
Faria Julio,
Vasilevsky CarolAnn,
Boutros Marylise
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.15633
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , logistic regression , colorectal cancer , quality of life (healthcare) , retrospective cohort study , cohort , cohort study , rectum , cancer , surgery , physical therapy , nursing
Aim The aim of this study was to assess bowel‐related financial stress and strain and to evaluate its association with global quality of life. Method This was a retrospective cohort study with cross‐sectional follow‐up including consecutive patients who underwent restorative proctectomy for neoplastic disease of the rectum at a single university‐affiliated hospital in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Bowel‐related financial impact and occupational impact were compared between patients with major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and those with minor/no LARS. The association between LARS, bowel‐related financial impact and global quality of life (QoL) was then assessed in a multiple logistic regression model. Results Of 180 eligible rectal cancer survivors who were contacted, 154 completed the questionnaires (response rate 47.1%) at a median follow‐up of 57.5 months (interquartile range 34.1–98.1) after proctectomy. Individuals with major LARS reported a higher prevalence of bowel‐related financial stress (53.2% vs 5.6%, p  < 0.001) and strain (42.2% vs 5.6%, p  < 0.001) compared with those with minor/no LARS. Among those who were working preoperatively ( n  = 100), the majority of participants with major LARS reported an impact of their new bowel function on their ability to work (70.6%), including delayed return to work (44.1%), the need to change schedules (35.3%) or roles (20.6%), and complete long‐term medical absence from work (14.7%). On multiple logistic regression, major LARS with financial impact (OR 4.50, 95% CI 1.57–13.77) was associated with low global QoL compared with minor/no LARS. Conclusion Major LARS was associated with considerable financial stress and strain and difficulties in returning to work.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here