z-logo
Premium
Analysis of colectomy rates for ulcerative colitis in pre‐ and postbiological eras in Lothian, Scotland
Author(s) -
Jenkinson Philip W.,
Plevris Nikolas,
Lyons Mathew,
Grant Rebecca,
Fulforth James,
Kirkwood Kate,
Arnott Ian D.,
Wilson David,
Watson Angus J. M.,
Jones GarethRhys,
Lees Charlie W.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.15491
Subject(s) - colectomy , medicine , ulcerative colitis , medical prescription , colorectal surgery , surgery , gastroenterology , disease , abdominal surgery , pharmacology
Abstract Aim Biological treatment is effective in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis (UC), although the effect on colectomy rates remains unclear. In the UK the use of antitumour necrosis factor and anti‐α4β7 treatments for maintenance therapy in UC was restricted until 2015. The aim of this study was to describe the impact that this change in the prescribing of biologicals had on colectomy rates for UC. Method All patients (adult and paediatric) with a diagnosis of UC who received maintenance biological treatment and/or underwent a colectomy in Lothian, Scotland between 2005 and 2018 were identified. Linear and segmental regression analyses were used to identify the annual percentage change (APC) and temporal trends (statistical joinpoints) in biological prescription and colectomy rates. Results Rates of initiation of maintenance biological therapy increased from 0.05 per 100 UC patients in 2005 to 1.26 in 2018 ( p  < 0.001). Colectomy rates per 100 UC patients fell from 1.47 colectomies in 2005 to 0.44 in 2018 ( p  < 0.001). The APC for colectomy decreased by 4.1% per year between 2005 and 2014 and by 18.9% between 2014 and 2018. Temporal trend analysis (2005–2018) identified a significant joinpoint in colectomy rates in 2014 ( p  = 0.019). Conclusion The use of maintenance biological therapy increased sharply following the change in guidance. This has been paralleled by a significant reduction in the rates of colectomy over the same time period.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here