z-logo
Premium
Session 2: Synchronous metastatic disease–liver first or primary first? The oncologist decides
Author(s) -
Wale A.,
Van Cutsem E.,
Rao S.,
Cunningham D.,
Brown G.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.14080
Subject(s) - medicine , session (web analytics) , disease , oncology , liver disease , general surgery , world wide web , computer science
There have been no randomized trial data to guide teams with regard to the order of surgery in patients with synchronous metastatic disease. On the one hand patients with borderline resectable liver metastases may lose the opportunity to undergo curative liver resection if the primary is resected first. For other patients, a symptomatic primary cancer may not be amenable to a delay. In the absence of clear evidence‐based outcomes, Professor Van Cutsem shares the recent expert consensus opinions on the current recommendations and an overview of the limited evidence base available.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here