Premium
Magnetic resonance imaging following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer
Author(s) -
São Julião G. P.,
Ortega C. D.,
Vailati B. B.,
HabrGama A.,
Fernandez L. M.,
GamaRodrigues J.,
Araujo S. E.,
Perez R. O.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.13691
Subject(s) - medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , colorectal cancer , radiology , chemoradiotherapy , surgery , cancer , radiation therapy
Aim Full‐thickness local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy ( CRT ) for patients with rectal cancer and incomplete clinical response has been a treatment strategy for organ preservation. Follow‐up of these patients is challenging since anatomic distortion and postoperative changes may be clinically indistinguishable from tumour recurrence. MRI may have a role in detecting recurrence. The aim of this study was to describe the MRI findings during follow‐up in patients having local excision following CRT with and without local recurrence. Method The data were collected retrospectively from a single centre. Fifty‐three patients with rectal cancer who had full‐thickness local excision after neoadjuvant CRT and near‐complete response were eligible for the study. Patients with local recurrence were treated by radical salvage surgery. The main outcome was local MRI assessment findings during follow‐up. Results Fifteen patients (five who developed local recurrence and 10 with no evidence of local recurrence) had MR images available for review and were included in the study. High signal intensity and thickening of the rectal wall were present in all patients with recurrent disease within the rectal wall. Overall, 80% of the patients with recurrence showed diffusion restriction. MRI mesorectal fascia status and circumferential resection margin showed agreement in all cases. A low signal intensity scar was seen in all patients without recurrent disease. Conclusion MRI shows high signal intensity and thickening of the rectal wall in recurrent disease in comparison to a low signal intensity fibrotic scar in non‐recurrent disease. These findings may be useful in surveillance of these patients.