Premium
Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Emile S. H.,
Elfeki H. A.,
Youssef M.,
Farid M.,
Wexner S. D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.13574
Subject(s) - medicine , rectal prolapse , constipation , meta analysis , complication , surgery , medline , incidence (geometry) , general surgery , rectum , physics , optics , political science , law
Aim Internal rectal prolapse ( IRP ) is a unique functional disorder that presents with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, including constipation and/or faecal incontinence ( FI ). The present review aims to analyse the results of trials evaluating the role of abdominal rectopexy in the treatment of IRP with regard to regarding functional and technical outcomes. Method A systematic review of the literature for the role of abdominal rectopexy in patients with IRP was conducted. PubMed/Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for published and unpublished studies from January 2000 to December 2015. Results We reviewed 14 studies including 1301 patients (1180 women) of a median age of 59 years. The weighted mean rates of improvement of obstructed defaecation ( OD ) and FI across the studies were 73.9% and 60.2%, respectively. Twelve studies reported clinical recurrence in 84 (6.9%) patients. The weighted mean recurrence rate of IRP among the studies was 5.8% (95% CI : 4.2–7.5). Two hundred and thirty complications were reported with a weighted mean complication rate of 15%. Resection rectopexy had lower recurrence rates than did ventral rectopexy, whereas ventral rectopexy achieved better symptomatic improvement, a shorter operative time and a lower complication rate. Conclusion Abdominal rectopexy for IRP attained satisfactory results with improvement of OD and, to a lesser extent, FI , a low incidence of recurrence and an acceptable morbidity rate. Although ventral rectopexy was associated with higher recurrence rates, lower complication rates and better improvement of bowel symptoms than resection rectopexy, these findings cannot be confirmed owing to the limitations of this review.