Premium
Transanal minimally invasive rectal resection for deep endometriosis: a promising technique
Author(s) -
Vlek S. L.,
Lier M. C. I.,
Koedam T. W. A.,
Melgers I.,
Dekker J. J. M. L.,
Bonjer J. H.,
Mijatovic V.,
Tuynman J. B.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.13569
Subject(s) - medicine , rectum , surgery , perioperative , prospective cohort study , pelvis , endometriosis , laparoscopy , quality of life (healthcare) , colorectal surgery , abdominal surgery , gynecology , nursing
Aim Surgical management of patients with deep endometriosis (DE) of the rectum is difficult. Inflammation and subsequent adhesions due to DE impede access to the lower pelvis and may lead to complications during laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an alternative to an abdominal approach with potential advantages. The aim of this study was to provide a description of the TAMIS technique and to present the perioperative results of TAMIS and of conventional LAR in patients with DE. Method A prospective consecutive cohort of patients undergoing rectal resection for DE had either conventional laparoscopic LAR or TAMIS rectal excision. Pre‐, intra‐ and postoperative parameters, such as patient symptomatology, operating time and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC‐QLQ‐29/30 questionnaires. Results Between May 2014 and March 2016 a total of 11 rectal resections were performed, including five TAMIS procedures. No differences were found in the pre‐, intra‐ or postoperative parameters. Two major complications occurred after conventional LAR and none after TAMIS. No differences in quality of life were found between the groups. Conclusion Transanal minimally invasive surgery for DE of the rectum is feasible. Potential advantages include better surgical access to the pelvis, possibly fewer complications than LAR and no extraction incision with no difference in quality of life. Larger prospective studies are required to compare TAMIS with conventional rectal resection.