Premium
Inter‐observer and intra‐observer variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: correlation of pathological and endoscopic findings
Author(s) -
Allende D.,
Elmessiry M.,
Hao W.,
DaSilva G.,
Wexner S. D.,
Bejarano P.,
Berho M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.12667
Subject(s) - medicine , dysplasia , pathological , inflammatory bowel disease , ulcerative colitis , endoscopy , gastroenterology , epithelial dysplasia , radiology , confidence interval , disease , lesion , correlation , surgery , geometry , mathematics
Aim Colonic epithelial dysplasia is deemed the precursor lesion of cancer arising in inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ). It has been suggested that many dysplastic lesions could be endoscopically detected to obtain target biopsies, leading to better yield. However, the clinical impact of a diagnosis of dysplasia may be hampered by a significant degree of histological and endoscopic intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability. This study aimed to evaluate intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability in the microscopic diagnosis of dysplasia in IBD and correlate endoscopic and histological findings. Method In total, 158 cases of ulcerative colitis and 14 of Crohn's disease with dysplasia were selected from a pathology database. Slides were blindly reviewed twice by two expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Results of endoscopic examinations were extracted from the reports. The degree of intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability was determined by kappa statistics. Results Overall, there was an excellent degree of histopathological inter‐observer agreement (κ = 0.786). The lowest level of agreement in the dysplasia group was for indefinite dysplasia (κ = 0.251). Negative and high grade dysplasia diagnosis reached the highest level of agreement with κ values of 0.822 [95% confidence interval ( CI ) 0.673–0.971] and 1.00 (95% CI 0.850–1.149), respectively. Intra‐observer agreement was good and increased during the latter period of the study (κ = 0.734, 95% CI 0.642–0.826). Endoscopic–histological correlation was poor among the negative endoscopies, as up to 43% of cases were diagnosed with at least focal high grade dysplasia. The endoscopic–histological correlation improved when evaluating suspicious endoscopic lesions. Conclusion Dysplasia is reliably diagnosed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists but has poor correlation with an endoscopic diagnosis of dysplasia.