z-logo
Premium
The ‘not so short‐bowel syndrome’: potential health problems in patients with an ileostomy
Author(s) -
Ng D. H. L.,
Pither C. A. R.,
Wootton S. A.,
Stroud M. A.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/codi.12252
Subject(s) - medicine , short bowel syndrome , creatinine , bone mineral , ileostomy , urinary system , body mass index , lean body mass , gastroenterology , endocrinology , urology , body weight , parenteral nutrition , osteoporosis
Aim The study aimed to determine whether an ileostomy compromises nutritional, hydration and electrolyte status and bone mineral density. Method Body weight, body mass index ( BMI ) and fat and lean body mass ( LBM ) were measured in 60 patients with an ileostomy [14 small‐bowel resection ( SBR ); 46 non‐small‐bowel resection ( NSBR )] and in 60 age‐ and sex‐matched normal controls. Measurement of plasma sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, urea and creatinine and 24‐h urinary output of water, N a, K , C a and M g was made in 45 NSBR and 14 SBR ileostomists and in all the controls. Forty‐six NSBR and 13 SBR ileostomists had bone mineral density ( BMD ) measurements of lumbar spine ( LS ) and femoral neck ( FN ). Results The body weight of ileostomists was less than controls [median 67.8 (36.4–115.1) vs 77.7 (48.0–103.3) kg; P  <   0.05]. BMI was also less [25.0 (14.3–43.0) vs 27.3 (20.2–32.2) kg/m 2 ; P  <   0.05] with a lower LBM [47.8 (19.3–73.0) vs 52.9 (34.0–73.8) kg; P  <   0.05]. The 24‐h urinary output of the ileostomists was lower than for controls [1380 (430–4690) vs 2000 (840–4440) ml/24 h; P  <   0.05] suggesting some degree of dehydration. In 62.7% of ileostomists 24‐h urinary N a excretion was < 100 mmol/day vs 16.7% of controls, and ileostomists with lower urinary N a were more likely than ileostomists with normal N a excretion to have a low BMI [23.9 (14.3–33.0) vs 28.4 (16.6–43.0) kg/m 2 ; P  <   0.001] and LBM [44.1 (19.3–73.0) vs 59.5 (36.6–67.9) kg; P  <   0.001]. The respective 24‐h output of C a was [2.2 (0–6.1) vs 4.7 (0–13) mmol; P  <   0.001] and M g was [2.0 (0–13.7) vs 3.9 (1.2–5.4) mmol; P  <   0.001], and BMD Z ‐score LS was −0.15 (−2.0 to 5.2) vs 0.3 (−2.5 to 2.1), Z ‐score FN −0.5 (−1.9 to 3.1) vs 0.2 (−1.2 to 1.4), both P  <   0.05. Conclusion Patients with an ileostomy tend to have low body weight, BMI , LBM and BMD . They also tend to have low urine volumes, and some are depleted of N a, C a and M g. Abnormalities are greater in those with a lower urinary N a and measuring this will identify ileostomists at risk of N a depletion who will be benefitted by N a supplements.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom