z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of lymphocyte transformation tests as compared with patch tests in nickel allergy diagnosis
Author(s) -
Ständer Sascha,
Oppel Eva,
Thomas Peter,
Summer Burkhard
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
contact dermatitis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1600-0536
pISSN - 0105-1873
DOI - 10.1111/cod.12751
Subject(s) - patch test , medicine , allergy , sensitization , nickel allergy , gold standard (test) , contact allergy , contact dermatitis , immunology , gastroenterology , dermatology
Summary Background The patch test is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing nickel ( N i) allergy. The lymphocyte transformation test ( LTT ) can also be used to detect N i sensitization. However, little is known about the correlation between patch test and LTT reactions to N i. Objective To establish and validate an LTT for N i sensitization by comparison with patch test reaction and history. Methods Fifty individuals without self‐reported ‘ N i allergy’ (controls) and 50 patients with self‐reported suspicion of N i allergy were included. A questionnaire‐aided history was taken, and patch tests with at least the baseline series and LTT s with various N i SO 4 dilutions were performed. Results In the patch tests, 2 of 50 controls and 18 of 50 patients with self‐reported suspicion of N i allergy showed positive reactions to N i. In the LTT s, 2 of 50 controls and 26 of 50 patients with self‐reported suspicion of N i allergy showed positive reactions to N i SO 4 2.5 × 10 −5 m , and 2 of 50 controls and 17 of 50 patients with self‐reported suspicion of N i allergy showed positive reactions to N i SO 4 1 × 10 −5 m . Sixteen of the 18 history‐positive and patch test‐positive patients (i.e. 88% sensitivity) were also LTT ‐positive, in contrast to only 2 positive LTT reactors within the 48 PT and history negative individuals (i.e. 96% specificity). [Correction added on 16 February 2017, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been edited for language and this has been amended in this version.] Conclusion Performing the LTT with optimized stimulating conditions might be a useful additional tool for the diagnosis of N i allergy if non‐sensitized controls are included.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom