Premium
Cobalt release from earrings and piercing jewellery – analytical results of a G erman survey
Author(s) -
Uter Wolfgang,
Schmid Matthias,
Schmidt Oliver,
Bock Constance,
Wolter Jörg
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
contact dermatitis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1600-0536
pISSN - 0105-1873
DOI - 10.1111/cod.12227
Subject(s) - cobalt , contact allergy , medicine , nickel , occupational exposure , contact dermatitis , metallurgy , allergy , materials science , environmental health , immunology
Summary Background Contact sensitization to cobalt is common. Some industrial exposures have been identified, but cobalt allergy is also often diagnosed in ‘non‐occupational’ patients. Exposure of consumers is largely unexplained. Objective To present the analytical results on cobalt release from earrings and piercing jewellery sampled in a G erman F ederal surveillance scheme. Methods Two G erman state laboratories analysed cobalt release, after immersion in artificial sweat according to EN 1811, along with nickel release in 87 pieces of jewellery, which were mostly taken apart for separate examination of piercing posts (n = 139), clasps (n = 51), and/or decorative items (n = 52). The distribution of cobalt release was described by the use of K aplan– M eier analysis, taking into account that the majority of measurements were left‐censored, that is, below the limit of quantification. Results Thirty‐eight of 87 earrings and piercing jewellery items had at least one part releasing cobalt. The median cobalt release was estimated as 0.013 µg/cm 2 /week, and 75% of parts released up to 0.085 µg/cm 2 /week. Release varied somewhat between the three parts, with, for example, 22.1% of posts releasing ≥ 0.2 µg/cm 2 /week. Conclusions Cobalt release from earrings and piercing jewellery, in particular from piercing posts, is considerable. Scientifically based exposure limits should be set, as in the case of nickel.