z-logo
Premium
Benefits of protected areas for nonbreeding waterbirds adjusting their distributions under climate warming
Author(s) -
Gaget Elie,
PavónJordán Diego,
Johnston Alison,
Lehikoinen Aleksi,
Hochachka Wesley M.,
Sandercock Brett K.,
Soultan Alaaeldin,
Azafzaf Hichem,
Bendjedda Nadjiba,
Bino Taulant,
Božič Luka,
Clausen Preben,
Dakki Mohamed,
Devos Koen,
Domsa Cristi,
Encarnação Vitor,
ErciyasYavuz Kiraz,
Faragó Sándor,
Frost Teresa,
Gaudard Clemence,
Gosztonyi Lívia,
Haas Fredrik,
Hornman Menno,
Langendoen Tom,
Ieronymidou Christina,
Kostyushin Vasiliy A.,
Lewis Lesley J.,
Lorentsen SveinHåkon,
Luigujõe Leho,
Meissner Włodzimierz,
Mikuska Tibor,
Molina Blas,
Musilová Zuzana,
Natykanets Viktor,
Paquet JeanYves,
Petkov Nicky,
Portolou Danae,
Ridzoň Jozef,
Sayoud Samir,
Šćiban Marko,
Sniauksta Laimonas,
Stīpniece Antra,
Strebel Nicolas,
Teufelbauer Norbert,
Topić Goran,
Uzunova Danka,
Vizi Andrej,
Wahl Johannes,
Zenatello Marco,
Brommer Jon E.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/cobi.13648
Subject(s) - climate change , colonization , ecology , biodiversity , extinction debt , global warming , geography , global biodiversity , range (aeronautics) , environmental science , biology , habitat destruction , materials science , composite material
Abstract Climate warming is driving changes in species distributions and community composition. Many species have a so‐called climatic debt, that is, shifts in range lag behind shifts in temperature isoclines. Inside protected areas (PAs), community changes in response to climate warming can be facilitated by greater colonization rates by warm‐dwelling species, but also mitigated by lowering extirpation rates of cold‐dwelling species. An evaluation of the relative importance of colonization‐extirpation processes is important to inform conservation strategies that aim for both climate debt reduction and species conservation. We assessed the colonization‐extirpation dynamics involved in community changes in response to climate inside and outside PAs. To do so, we used 25 years of occurrence data of nonbreeding waterbirds in the western Palearctic (97 species, 7071 sites, 39 countries, 1993–2017). We used a community temperature index (CTI) framework based on species thermal affinities to investigate species turnover induced by temperature increase. We determined whether thermal community adjustment was associated with colonization by warm‐dwelling species or extirpation of cold‐dwelling species by modeling change in standard deviation of the CTI (CTI SD ). Using linear mixed‐effects models, we investigated whether communities in PAs had lower climatic debt and different patterns of community change than communities outside PAs. For CTI and CTI SD combined, communities inside PAs had more species, higher colonization, lower extirpation, and lower climatic debt (16%) than communities outside PAs. Thus, our results suggest that PAs facilitate 2 independent processes that shape community dynamics and maintain biodiversity. The community adjustment was, however, not sufficiently fast to keep pace with the large temperature increases in the central and northeastern western Palearctic. Our results underline the potential of combining CTI and CTI SD metrics to improve understanding of the colonization‐extirpation patterns driven by climate warming.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here