Open AccessDetecting Change over Time: A Comparison of the SLUMS Examination and the MMSE in Older Adults at Risk for Cognitive Decline
Author(s) -
Howland Molly,
Tatsuoka Curtis,
Smyth Kathleen A.,
Sajatovic Martha
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cns neuroscience and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1755-5949
pISSN - 1755-5930
DOI - 10.1111/cns.12515
Subject(s) - raw score , activities of daily living , mini–mental state examination , cognition , gerontology , dementia , medicine , psychology , demography , physical therapy , cognitive impairment , raw data , psychiatry , statistics , mathematics , sociology , disease
Summary Aims To directly compare the 1‐year stability of Mini‐Mental State Examination ( MMSE ) score and Saint Louis University Mental Status ( SLUMS ) examination score and correlate score changes with demographic variables, clinical factors, and functional domains. Methods A sample of 304 study participants was recruited from residential and clinical settings in Ohio. Follow‐up assessments were administered after 1 year with a retention rate of 92% (n = 281). Functional domains included the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living ( IADL ) scale. Results MMSE and SLUMS scores correlated with each other ( r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and with two functional measures, including the IADL ( r = 0.27, r = 0.24, P < 0.001). However, the MMSE and SLUMS frequently placed the same subject into different categories. Rates of reversion and conversion varied between the two tests. The 1‐year changes in MMSE raw score correlated with changes in three functional domains as well as age ( P < 0.05), while SLUMS raw score changes did not correlate with any functional measures. Conclusion Our large, longitudinal data set allowed us to compare the tests' stability, which differed between the SLUMS and MMSE . The MMSE may be more sensitive than the SLUMS to 1‐year cognitive changes influencing functional abilities.