z-logo
Premium
Bone heating and implant removal using a high‐frequency electrosurgical device: An in vivo experimental study
Author(s) -
Kawamura Atsushi,
Akiba Yosuke,
Nagasawa Masako,
Takashima Makiko,
Arai Yoshiaki,
Uoshima Katsumi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.13793
Subject(s) - implant , dentistry , biomedical engineering , electron microprobe , materials science , reduction (mathematics) , medicine , surgery , metallurgy , geometry , mathematics
Objectives Failed implant removal using a high‐frequency electrosurgical device (HFED) has been reported to be less invasive than other surgical techniques. We sought to clarify the mechanism of removal torque reduction in an implant by heating with HFED. Materials and Methods Sixty‐eight Wistar rats received titanium implants on the maxillary bone 4 weeks after extraction of the first and second molars. The control group was sacrificed 6 weeks after implant installation. In the experimental group, the implant was heated by HFED for 10 s using three different power outputs, and samples were collected at 3, 7, and 14 days after heating. Removal torque measurement and histological analysis were performed in the control and experimental groups. Implant surfaces were observed using an electron‐probe microanalyzer (EPMA). Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test at a significance level of 5%. Results The removal torque could not be measured in the control group due to fracture of the implant. After heating, the removal torque was measurable without fracture and decreased significantly at 14 days as compared with that at 3 days ( p  < .05). Heating with “min” power output resulted in a significantly smaller blank lacunae area and fewer osteoclasts at 14 days after heating ( p  < .05). EPMA revealed bone matrix adherence to outer surface of heated implant. Conclusions After heating, an enlarged area of blank lacunae around the implant and an increased number of osteoclasts into the bone marrow cavity were observed, which may have contributed to the reduction in removal torque.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here