z-logo
Premium
The migration of neighboring and antagonist teeth three months after implant placement in healed single tooth‐missing sites
Author(s) -
Guo Danni,
Pan Shaoxia,
Mühlemann Sven,
Zhou Yongsheng,
Jung Ronald
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.13694
Subject(s) - dentistry , implant , medicine , posterior teeth , orthodontics , mann–whitney u test , surgery
Abstract Objectives To quantify the neighboring and antagonist teeth migration of a single posterior tooth‐missing site within 3 months using digital scanning and measuring techniques. Materials and Methods Intraoral scans (IOS) were made in 40 patients presenting a single posterior tooth‐missing gap and receiving implant therapy. IOS were obtained at the day of and three months after implant surgery rendering a digital baseline model (BM) and a digital follow‐up model (FM). Digital models were superimposed using the implant scan body as reference. Antagonist models were processed by the best fit alignment. Dimensional change between anatomical landmarks on neighboring teeth and that of featuring points on antagonistic teeth were measured using a three‐dimensional analysis software. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare the tooth‐moving distance between the mesial and distal neighboring teeth. The Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA was used to test the difference in dimensional change in tooth‐missing site among age subgroups. Results The mean dimensional change in the tooth‐missing site was −37.62 ± 106.36 μm (median: −28.33 μm, Q 25 −72.65/ Q 75 38.97) mesial‐distally and −67.91 ± 42.37 μm (median: −61.50 μm, Q 25 −88.25/ Q 75 −36.75) occlusal‐gingivally. Eighteen out of 40 mesial neighboring teeth and 24 out of 40 distal neighboring teeth showed migration towards the implants. When patients were grouped according to age, the mesial‐distal reduction in the tooth‐missing site was significantly larger in patients younger than 30 years compared with those older than 50 years ( p  < .05). Conclusions The dimensions of posterior tooth‐missing sites decreased over an observation period of 3 months.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here