Premium
Changes of clinical parameters at implants: A retrospective comparison of implants versus natural teeth over 5 years of supportive periodontal therapy
Author(s) -
Sonnenschein Sarah K.,
Kohnen Rebecca,
Ciardo Antonio,
Ziegler Philipp,
Seide Svenja,
Kim TiSun
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.13601
Subject(s) - dentistry , medicine , retrospective cohort study , orthodontics , surgery
Objectives To compare clinical parameters of implants versus natural teeth over a period of 5 years during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Material and Methods A total of 421 SPT patients were screened for implants (I) and corresponding control teeth (C). Data (patient level [ P ]: sex, age, smoking status, systemic diseases, adherence, oral hygiene indices, mean probing depth [PD] P , bleeding on probing [BOP] P , periodontal risk profile; implant/control tooth level [ I/C ]: PD I/C , BOP I/C ; site level at implants [ SITE ]: position, dental arch, aspect, BOP SITE ) were assessed at the first SPT session where the implant was probed (T1) and 5 years later (T2). The influence of patient and implant/control‐related factors on PD I/C /BOP I/C was tested (linear mixed model) as well as the influence of site‐specific factors on the PD SITE change (multilevel regression). Results A total of 70 patients (151 implants) were included. Mean PD I was 2.75 ± 0.85 mm (T1) and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm (T2). Mean PD C was 2.42 ± 0.66 mm (T1) and 2.49 ± 0.71 mm (T2). BOP I increased from 8.62 ± 15.01% (T1) to 24.06 ± 26.79% (T2) and BOP C from 9.97 ± 17.78% (T1) to 15.52 ± 22.69% (T2). The differences between implants and controls were significant for BOP ( p = .0032). At T2, BOP I/C was associated with periodontal risk ( p = .0351). The site‐specific analysis revealed an association of BOP SITE at T1 with the progression of PD SITE ( p = .0058). Conclusions Probing depths of implants and controls seem to change similarly during SPT but retention of inflammation‐free conditions at implants appears to be more difficult compared to natural teeth. Patients with a high‐risk profile appear to have an increased susceptibility for BOP around implants, and BOP at implants seems to be a predictor for further PD increase.