Premium
Original vs. non‐original abutments for screw‐retained single implant crowns: An in vitro evaluation of internal fit, mechanical behaviour and screw loosening
Author(s) -
AlonsoPérez Raquel,
Bartolomé José F.,
Ferreiroa Alberto,
Salido María P.,
Pradíes Guillermo
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.13390
Subject(s) - implant , abutment , crown (dentistry) , dentistry , orthodontics , reduction (mathematics) , materials science , dental abutments , mathematics , medicine , structural engineering , engineering , geometry , surgery
Objectives To assess the internal accuracy, mechanical behaviour under static load and screw loosening before and after cyclic loading of implant‐supported crowns restored with original components or with two compatible non‐original brands. Materials and Methods Sixty‐three dental implants were divided into three groups ( n = 21 each): Group 1 used original components, and groups 2 and 3 used non‐original components. Internal accuracy was measured throughout a cross section of the sample groups ( n = 8) using scanning electron microscopy ( SEM ) to evaluate the fit for implant–abutments, implant–crowns and crown–abutments. To evaluate load‐bearing capacity, eight samples from each group were loaded until fracture according to ISO Norm 14801. The removal torque value ( RTV ) was evaluated in the screws connecting the crown with the abutment and the abutment with the implant before and after cyclic loading (2 x 10 6 cycles) in five samples from each group. The data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test ( p < 0.05). Results Statistically significant differences were found among the mean crown–abutment gaps measured in Group 1 (9.3 μm), Group 2 (45.4 μm) and Group 3 (44.9 μm). Higher values for mean load‐bearing capacity were found in Group 1 (1,098 N) than in groups 2 and 3 (1,057 and 973 N, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Original abutment–implant screws exhibited lower percentages of torque reduction than the non‐originals. Conclusions Enhanced fit is expected when original components are used. The original abutments exhibited lower percentages of torque reduction after cyclic loading than non‐originals.