z-logo
Premium
Reconstructive aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5 th EAO Consensus Conference 2018
Author(s) -
Sailer Irena,
Mühlemann Sven,
Kohal Ralf J.,
Spies Benedikt C.,
Pjetursson Bjarni E.,
Lang Niklaus P.,
Gotfredsen Klaus L.,
Ellingsen Jan E.,
Francisco Helena,
Özcan Mutlu,
Hassan Bassam,
EstevePardo Guillem,
Bardaji Javier A.,
Kraus Riccardo D.,
Wennerberg Ann
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.13302
Subject(s) - consensus conference , consensus sequence , scientific consensus , group (periodic table) , medicine , library science , computer science , biology , physics , genetics , global warming , ecology , quantum mechanics , climate change , base sequence , gene
Abstract Objectives The tasks of this working group were to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficiency and efficacy of the digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed implant reconstructions, to assess the performance of all‐ceramic fixed implant reconstructions and, finally, to evaluate the outcomes of internally and externally connected implant abutments and reconstructions. Methods Four reviews were available analyzing the current literature on the respective topics. One review dealt with the efficiency and efficacy of digital and conventional fabrication workflows. Two reviews analyzed the outcomes of all‐ceramic fixed implant reconstructions, one focusing on single‐implant reconstructions and the other evaluating multiple‐unit implant fixed dental prostheses ( FDP s). The fourth review evaluated the clinical outcome on external, respectively, internal implant‐abutment connections. These reviews were the basis for the discussions within the group and at the plenary sessions. Results The present consensus report gives the consensus statements, the clinical recommendations, and the implications for future research as discussed and approved by the plenum of the consensus conference. The four manuscripts by Mühlemann et al., Rabel et al., Pieralli et al., and Pjetursson et al. are published as part of the journal supplement of the present EAO consensus conference.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here