Premium
Management of anticoagulated patients in implant therapy: a clinical comparative study
Author(s) -
Clemm R.,
Neukam F. W.,
Rusche B.,
Bauersachs A.,
Musazada S.,
Schmitt C. M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12732
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , implant , complication , hemostasis
Objectives This prospective clinical comparative study aimed to analyze the postoperative bleeding risk of patients continuing their anticoagulation therapy ( AT ) and undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures. Materials and methods The treatments ranged from the insertion of single or multiple dental implants over implant exposures to sinus floor augmentation and vertical and/or lateral bone grafting with autologous bone grafts. The patients of the test groups ( AT groups) were treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors ( PAI s), Vitamin‐K inhibitors, Vitamin‐K inhibitor withdrawal bridged with heparin ( LMWH ), or new/direct oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s/ DOAC s). Patients of the control group were non‐anticoagulated (non‐ AT group). Surgical procedures were performed in the same manner in all groups. Pre, intra, and postoperative data concerning the treatment, extent of the surgery and bleedings was recorded and statistically evaluated. Results There were seven postoperative bleedings in 564 patients (1.2%), four in the AT groups (3.4%), and three in the non‐ AT group (0.6%). No thromboembolic complication occurred in the whole observation period. The invasiveness of the surgical procedure had no statistically significant effect on bleeding frequencies. Patients taking Vitamin‐K inhibitors had a significantly higher risk of a postoperative bleeding compared to patients without any AT ( P = 0.038). Two patients were hospitalized due to the severity of the bleeding as a precautionary measure (one in the non‐ AT and one in the PAI group). All bleedings were easily controllable with local hemostatic measures. There was no postoperative bleeding recorded for patients taking DOAC s. Conclusions Anticoagulation therapy should be continued in patients undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures avoiding thromboembolic complications. Surgeons should always apply the most minimally invasive approach to reduce postoperative risks and be able to apply local hemostatic measures in terms of a bleeding complication.