z-logo
Premium
Bi‐layered zirconia/fluor‐apatite bridges supported by ceramic dental implants: a prospective case series after thirty months of observation
Author(s) -
Spies Benedikt Christopher,
Witkowski Siegbert,
Butz Frank,
Vach Kirstin,
Kohal RalfJoachim
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12731
Subject(s) - veneer , dentistry , maxilla , implant , cubic zirconia , medicine , dental porcelain , anterior maxilla , molar , materials science , ceramic , orthodontics , composite material , surgery
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the success and survival rate of all‐ceramic bi‐layered implant‐supported three‐unit fixed dental prostheses ( IS ‐ FDP s) 3 years after implant placement. Material and methods Thirteen patients (seven males, six females; age: 41–78 years) received two one‐piece ceramic implants (alumina‐toughened zirconia) each in the region of the premolars or the first molar and were finally restored with adhesively cemented bi‐layered zirconia‐based IS ‐ FDP s (3 in the maxilla, 10 in the mandible) composed of CAD / CAM ‐fabricated zirconia frameworks pressed‐over with fluor‐apatite glass‐ceramic ingots. At prosthetic delivery and the follow‐ups after 1, 2 and 3 years, the restorations were evaluated using modified United States Public Health Service ( USPHS ) criteria. Restorations with minor veneer chippings, a small‐area occlusal roughness, slightly soundable restoration margins, minimal contour deficiencies and tolerable color deviations were regarded as success. In case of more distinct defects that could, however, be repaired to a clinically acceptable level, IS ‐ FDP s were regarded as surviving. Kaplan–Meier plots were used for the success/survival analyses. To verify an impact on subjective patients’ perceptions, satisfaction was evaluated by visual analog scales ( VAS ). Results All patients were seen 3 years after implant installation. No IS ‐ FDP had to be replaced, resulting in 100% survival after a mean observation period of 29.5 months (median: 30.7). At the 3‐year follow‐up, 7/13 IS ‐ FDP s showed a veneer chipping, 13/13 an occlusal roughness and 12/13 minimal deficiencies of contour/color. Since six restorations showed a major chipping and/or a major occlusal roughness, the Kaplan–Meier success rate was 53.8%. However, patients’ significantly improved perceptions of function, esthetics, sense, and speech at prosthetic delivery remained stable over time. Conclusion Bi‐layered zirconia/fluor‐apatite IS ‐ FDP s entirely survived the observation period but showed a high frequency of technical complications. Nevertheless, the treatment highly satisfied patients’ expectations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom