Premium
Influence of hydroxyapatite granule size, porosity, and crystallinity on tissue reaction in vivo . Part A: synthesis, characterization of the materials, and SEM analysis
Author(s) -
Maté Sánchez de Val José E.,
CalvoGuirado José L.,
GómezMoreno Gerardo,
PérezAlbacete Martínez Carlos,
Mazón Patricia,
De Aza Piedad N.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12722
Subject(s) - crystallinity , resorption , porosity , materials science , particle size , granule (geology) , osseointegration , implant , chemistry , mineralogy , composite material , surgery , biology , medicine , endocrinology
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was the synthesis and analysis of the tissue reaction to three different Hydroxyapatite ( HA )‐based bone substitute materials differing only in granule size, porosity, and crystallinity through an animal experimental model at 60 days. Materials and methods Three different HA ‐based biomaterials were synthesized and characterized by X‐ray diffraction, SEM , and EDS analysis, the resultant product was ground in three particle sizes: Group I (2000–4000 μm), Group II (1000–2000 μm), and Group III (600–1000 μm). Critical size defects were created in both tibias of 15 rabbits. Four defects per rabbit for a total of 60 defects were grafted with the synthesized materials as follows: Group I (15 defects), Group II (15 defects), Group III (15 defects), and empty (15 defects control). After animals sacrifice at 60 days samples were obtained and processed for SEM and EDS evaluation of Ca/P ratios, elemental mapping was performed to determine the chemical degradation process and changes to medullary composition in all the four study groups. Results The tendency for the density was to increase with the increasing annealing temperature; in this way it was possible to observe that the sample that shows highest crystallinity and crystal size corresponding to that of group I. The SEM morphological examination showed that group III implant showed numerous resorption regions, group II implant presented an average resorption rate of all the implants. The group I displayed smoother surface features, in comparison with the other two implants. Conclusion The data from this study show that changing the size, porosity, and crystallinity of one HA ‐based bone substitute material can influence the integration of the biomaterials within the implantation site and the new bone formation.