Premium
Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia‐based dental implantology
Author(s) -
Duttenhoefer Fabian,
Mertens Marianne E.,
Vizkelety Josef,
Gremse Felix,
Stadelmann Vincent A.,
Sauerbier Sebastian
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12430
Subject(s) - implant , magnetic resonance imaging , titanium , materials science , cone beam computed tomography , medicine , dental implant , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , radiology , computed tomography , surgery , metallurgy
Objectives X‐ray‐based planning and post‐implantation assessment of titanium implants is the commonly accepted standard to date. However, new implant materials such as zirconia (ZrO 2 ) have become available, and magnetic resonance imaging may be a valuable alternative with these implants. The present in vitro study investigated artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia implants in magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) and assessed the accuracy of pre‐implant planning and post‐implantation assessment comparing MRI to standard X‐ray‐based imaging modalities: Orthopantomogram ( OPT ), cone beam ( CBCT ), and computed tomography ( CT ). Materials and methods Twelve porcine mandibles were prepared and scanned ( MRI , OPT , CBCT , μ CT ), and bone height above the nerve canal was measured. Specimens were implanted with either two titanium or zirconia implants and rescanned to investigate the influence of implant materials on post‐implantation assessment. MRI and μ CT artifacts were quantified with implants embedded in gelatin phantoms and porcine specimens. Results Compared with CBCT set as standard, μ CT , OPT , and MRI showed similar accuracy in pre‐op bone height measurements. Post‐implantation, while titanium implants induced a strong B 0 ‐field distortion resulting in extensive signal voids, zirconia implants were clearly depictable with only minor distortions. Conclusions Excellent contrast, limited artifacts, radiation‐free and accurate implant assessment may indicate that MRI is a valuable imaging alternative for zirconia‐based implant dentistry.