z-logo
Premium
Impact of autogenous concentrated bone marrow aspirate on bone regeneration after sinus floor augmentation with a bovine bone substitute – a split‐mouth pilot study
Author(s) -
Wildburger Angelika,
Payer Michael,
Jakse Norbert,
Strunk Dirk,
EtchardLiechtenstein Nathalie,
Sauerbier Sebastian
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12228
Subject(s) - sinus (botany) , dentistry , biomaterial , medicine , bone marrow , mesenchymal stem cell , surgery , pathology , biomedical engineering , biology , botany , genus
Purpose Mesenchymal stem cells ( MSC ) with biomaterials have osteoinductive potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate early bone formation in xenogenic sinus grafts in a direct comparison with and without MSC s after 3 and 6 months. Literature on bone formation in pure xenogenic graft materials after 3 months in a human model is still lacking. Materials and methods In a split‐mouth design, seven patients with a bilateral highly atrophic posterior maxilla were included. The test side was grafted with MSC s from concentrated bone marrow aspirate admixed to the bone graft material. On the control side, pure bovine bone material was applied. Biopsies were taken navigated after 3 and 6 months. Results After 3 months, new bone formation in the control group was 11.8% (SD 6.2%) and in the test group 7.4% (SD 4.1%). After 6 months, the control group showed 13.9% (SD 8.5%) of new bone and the test group 13.5% NB (SD 5.4%). The fraction of bovine bone material after 3 months was 42.6% (SD 3.5%) in the test group and 34.9% (SD 11.8%) in the control group. After 6 months, the biomaterial content was comparable at both sides (test 36.2%, SD 7.8%; control 39.5%, SD 9.3%). Conclusions There was no significant difference in new bone formation between the test and control group with n  = 7. The results may be dominated by the high mineral content of the biomaterial but could nevertheless be valuable for meta‐analysis in the future.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here