z-logo
Premium
Fracture resistance of single‐tooth implant‐supported zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered molar restorations
Author(s) -
Taguchi Kohei,
Komine Futoshi,
Fushiki Ryosuke,
Blatz Markus B.,
Kamio Shingo,
Matsumura Hideo
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12199
Subject(s) - cubic zirconia , materials science , molar , universal testing machine , dentistry , composite number , composite material , implant , fracture (geology) , ceramic , medicine , surgery , ultimate tensile strength
Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single‐tooth implant‐supported zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty‐four titanium abutments ( G ingi H ue P ost) were placed on dental implants ( O sseotite I mplant). Standardized single‐tooth cement‐retained implant‐supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups ( n  =   11) as follows: porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal crowns ( PFM ), zirconia‐based all‐ceramic crowns ( ZAC ), zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered crowns primed with E stenia O paque P rimer for zirconia frameworks ( ZIC ‐ E ), and zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered crowns ( ZIC ). The crowns were luted with a glass‐ionomer cement ( K etac C em E asymix). Fracture resistance ( N ) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One‐way analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) and the T ukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances ( SD ) were 3.09 (0.22) kN , 3.11 (0.34) kN , 2.84 (0.21) k N , and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM , ZAC , ZIC ‐ E , and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower ( P  <   0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single‐tooth implant‐supported zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered molar crowns primed with E stenia O paque P rimer for zirconia frameworks ( ZIC ‐ E ) is comparable to that of porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal ( PFM ) and zirconia‐based all‐ceramic ( ZAC ) restorations. Application of E stenia O paque P rimer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant‐supported zirconia‐based indirect composite‐layered molar crowns.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here