Premium
Peri‐implant bone formation of non‐thermal atmospheric pressure plasma–treated zirconia implants with different surface roughness in rabbit tibiae
Author(s) -
Shon WonJun,
Chung Shin Hye,
Kim HongKyun,
Han GeumJun,
Cho ByeongHoon,
Park YoungSeok
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical oral implants research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1600-0501
pISSN - 0905-7161
DOI - 10.1111/clr.12115
Subject(s) - osseointegration , cubic zirconia , implant , materials science , surface roughness , biomedical engineering , dentistry , composite material , medicine , surgery , ceramic
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the osseointegration of powder–injection molded (PIM) zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae with or without He plasma treatment. Material and methods Twenty‐five rabbits received 4 types of external hex implants with identical geometry in the tibiae: PIM zirconia implants, roughened PIM zirconia implants, plasma‐treated PIM zirconia implants, and plasma‐treated roughened PIM zirconia implants. The contact angles of the four types of implants were evaluated. Removal torque tests and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results The plasma treatment markedly enhanced the hydrophilicity, but did not seem to change the surface topography of the PIM zirconia implants. There were statistically significant differences in the bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) ratios, bone volume (BV/TV), and removal torque values (RTQ) among the tested implant types ( P < 0.001). The plasma‐treated implants exhibited significantly higher BIC and BV/TV values than the untreated implants. However, the removal torque values favored the rough surface. Conclusions The He plasma treatments on PIM zirconia implants made the surface more hydrophilic and enhanced the osseointegration of the implants without changing the micro‐topography.