Premium
Computer ‐ guided chin harvest: A novel approach for autogenous block harvest from the mandibular symphesis
Author(s) -
Osman Ahmed H.,
Atef Mohammed
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical implant dentistry and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.338
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1708-8208
pISSN - 1523-0899
DOI - 10.1111/cid.12610
Subject(s) - chin , medicine , dentistry , pulp (tooth) , dehiscence , blunt , wound dehiscence , orthodontics , surgery , anatomy
Background The introduction of CAD/CAM technology allowed clinicians to carry out complex procedures with a high level of precision and reproducibility and minimize the risk of injury during the procedure. Purpose The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of the CAD/CAM surgical guide during chin harvesting procedures in reducing the risk of neurosensory damage and patient morbidity compared with the standard technique. Materials and Methods About 20 cases of autogenous block chin harvest were randomly into two groups. The first group received computer‐guided chin block harvest while the second group received autogenous block chin harvest using the standard approach. Results In the guided group , out of the 10 subjects, 2 subjects presented with wound dehiscence which resolved within 1 month. No teeth showed any negative pulp sensitivity results. The pointed‐Blunt test and 2 point discrimination tests showed a single case of neurodeficits at 1 week follow‐up appointment which resolved within 1 month. In the nonguided group , out of the 10 subjects, 1 case presented with wound dehiscence that resolved completely within 1 month. Pulp vitality test showed negative results in 29.4% of the involved teeth at 1 week which decreased to 9.8% and 3.9% at 1 and 6 months follow‐up, respectively. The pointed blunt test revealed 3 subjects with neurodeficits at 1 week, out of which 2 subjects showed persisting symptoms at 6 months follow‐up. The 2 point discrimination test showed 3 subjects with neurodeficits, out of which two subjects showed persistent symptoms with no resolution at the 6 months follow‐up. Conclusion Within the limits of this study, computer‐guided chin harvest shows promising results in the reduction of neurosensory complications following harvesting procedures and presents as a safe alternative to the standard technique.