z-logo
Premium
Prader‐Willi syndrome genetic subtypes and clinical neuropsychiatric diagnoses in residential care adults
Author(s) -
Manzardo A.M.,
Weisensel N.,
Ayala S.,
Hossain W.,
Butler M.G.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1111/cge.13142
Subject(s) - medicine , uniparental disomy , psychiatry , genetic testing , medical diagnosis , anxiety , genetics , biology , pathology , gene , chromosome , karyotype
The historical diagnosis of Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS), a complex genetic disorder, in adults is often achieved by clinical presentation rather than by genetic testing and thus limited genetic subtype‐specific psychometric investigations and treatment options. Genetic testing and clinical psychiatric evaluation using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)‐IV‐TR criteria were undertaken on 72 adult residents (34 M; 38 F) from the Prader‐Willi Homes of Oconomowoc (PWHO), a specialty PWS group home system. Methylation specific‐multiplex ligation probe amplification and high‐resolution microarrays were analyzed for methylation status, 15q11‐q13 deletions and maternal uniparental disomy 15 (mUPD15). Seventy (33M; 37F) of 72 residents were genetically confirmed and 36 (51%) had Type I or Type II deletions; 29 (42%) with mUPD15 and 5 (7%) with imprinting defects from three separate families. Psychiatric comorbidities were classified as anxiety disorder (38%), excoriation (skin picking) (33%), intermittent explosive disorder ([30%‐predominantly among males at 45% compared with females at 16% [OR = 4.3, 95%CI 1.4‐13.1, P  < 0.008]) and psychotic features (23%). Psychiatric diagnoses did not differ between mUPD15 vs deletion, but a greater number of psychiatric diagnoses were observed for the larger Type I (4.3) vs smaller Type II (3.6) deletions when age was controlled ( F  = 5.0, P  < 0.04). Adults with PWS presented with uniformly higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities which differed by genetic subtype with gender‐specific trends.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here