z-logo
Premium
Performance of BRCA1 / 2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients
Author(s) -
Moghadasi S.,
Grundeken V.,
Janssen L.A.M.,
Dijkstra N.H.,
RodríguezGirondo M.,
van ZelstStams W.A.G.,
Oosterwijk J.C.,
Ausems M.G.E.M.,
Oldenburg R.A.,
Adank M.A.,
Blom E.W.,
Ruijs M.W.G.,
van Os T.A.M.,
van Deurzen C.H.M.,
Martens J.W.M.,
Schroder C.P.,
Wijnen J.T.,
Vreeswijk M.P.G.,
van Asperen C.J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1111/cge.13065
Subject(s) - breast cancer , receiver operating characteristic , confidence interval , medicine , incidence (geometry) , mutation , oncology , cancer , genetics , biology , mathematics , gene , geometry
To establish whether existing mutation prediction models can identify which male breast cancer ( MBC ) patients should be offered BRCA1 and BRCA2 diagnostic DNA screening, we compared the performance of BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm), BRCAPRO (BRCA probability) and the Myriad prevalence table (“Myriad”). These models were evaluated using the family data of 307 Dutch MBC probands tested for BRCA1 /2 , 58 (19%) of whom were carriers. We compared the numbers of observed vs predicted carriers and assessed the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic ( ROC ) Curve ( AUC ) for each model. BOADICEA predicted the total number of BRCA1 /2 mutation carriers quite accurately (observed/predicted ratio: 0.94). When a cut‐off of 10% and 20% prior probability was used, BRCAPRO showed a non‐significant better performance (observed/predicted ratio BOADICEA : 0.81, 95% confidence interval [ CI ]: [0.60‐1.09] and 0.79, 95% CI : [0.57‐1.09], vs. BRCAPRO : 1.02, 95% CI : [0.75‐1.38] and 0.94, 95% CI : [0.68‐1.31], respectively). Myriad underestimated the number of carriers in up to 69% of the cases. BRCAPRO showed a non‐significant, higher AUC than BOADICEA (0.798 vs 0.776). Myriad showed a significantly lower AUC (0.671). BRCAPRO and BOADICEA can efficiently identify MBC patients as BRCA1 /2 mutation carriers. Besides their general applicability, these tools will be of particular value in countries with limited healthcare resources.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here