z-logo
Premium
Proportionate universalism in child and family social work
Author(s) -
Dierckx Melissa,
Devlieghere Jochen,
Vandenbroeck Michel
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
child and family social work
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.912
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1365-2206
pISSN - 1356-7500
DOI - 10.1111/cfs.12689
Subject(s) - operationalization , conceptualization , universalism , social work , diversity (politics) , work (physics) , qualitative research , sociology , psychology , social psychology , social science , epistemology , political science , computer science , mechanical engineering , philosophy , artificial intelligence , politics , anthropology , law , engineering
Integrated services in preventive health care and child and family social work increasingly embrace the concept of proportionate universalism (PU) as a means of overcoming the dichotomy between universal and targeted services in contexts of diversity. The implementation of the concept of PU raises several theoretical and empirical questions that form the basis of this article. This study aims to provide more insight in how the concept of PU is operationalized in child and family social work. Qualitative research was performed in three specific cases of child and family social work, the so‐called “Huizen van het Kind” or Children's Houses in Flanders (Belgium). The study triangulates three perspectives: policy, organizational level, and street level. The findings generate three meta‐themes: perseverant structuring of populations or predefinitions, image and conceptualization of the Children's House, and organizational challenges. These results reveal a difference between the theoretical assumption of PU and the practical implementation in child and family social work.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here