Premium
Determining patient preferences in a glaucoma service: A discrete choice experiment
Author(s) -
Lu Thomas Chengxuan,
Angell Blake,
Dunn Hamish,
Ford Belinda,
White Andrew,
Keay Lisa
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical and experimental ophthalmology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.3
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1442-9071
pISSN - 1442-6404
DOI - 10.1111/ceo.13606
Subject(s) - medicine , mixed logit , willingness to pay , confidence interval , glaucoma , preference , logistic regression , family medicine , patient satisfaction , discrete choice , nursing , ophthalmology , machine learning , computer science , economics , microeconomics
Importance Patient perspectives are crucial in informing design of acceptable services. Background This study determined patient preferences in glaucoma care. Design A discrete choice experiment was used to evaluate the relative importance of out‐of‐pocket costs, waiting time, continuity of care, service location and expertise. Participants Ninety‐eight glaucoma suspects or glaucoma patients were recruited from one public and two private clinics in Sydney. Methods Twelve choice‐tasks were presented in random order and forced‐choice preferences were elicited. Choice data were analysed using a multinominal logit model (NLOGIT 4.0). Main Outcome Measures The relative importance and the likelihood of choosing services with each attribute were determined. Willingness‐to‐pay and willingness‐to‐wait were calculated. Analyses were stratified by whether the patient attended a public or private glaucoma clinic and other demographic features. Results Choice was influenced by four or five attributes: greater clinician expertise, the same clinician each visit, lower out‐of‐pocket costs and shorter wait times (all P < .05). Respondents were willing to pay an additional (Australian dollars) $325 (95% confidence interval [CI] 188‐389) to see a senior eye doctor, and $87 (95% CI 60‐116) to see the same clinician each visit. Respondents were willing to wait for these attributes; however, the estimates had wide confidence intervals and were beyond the range tested. Private patients had a stronger preference for expertise and continuity of care compared to public patients. Conclusions and Relevance Expertise and continuity of care were important to glaucoma patients in this setting, and they were willing to pay out‐of‐pocket and concede longer waiting times to secure these preferences.