Premium
Microarchitectural parameters and bone mineral density in patients with tumour‐induced osteomalacia by HR‐pQCT and DXA
Author(s) -
Mendes Danielle A. B.,
Coelho Maria C. A.,
Gehrke Bárbara,
Pinho Leandro K. J.,
Cardoso Lima Luis F.,
ParanhosNeto Francisco,
Mendonça Laura M. C.,
Farias M. L. Fleiuss,
Madeira Miguel
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical endocrinology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1365-2265
pISSN - 0300-0664
DOI - 10.1111/cen.14533
Subject(s) - bone mineral , medicine , quantitative computed tomography , osteomalacia , osteoporosis , nuclear medicine , bone density , endocrinology , urology
Tumour‐induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic condition characterised by decreased tubular phosphate reabsorption. The purpose of this study is to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture in six TIO patients, compared with 18 healthy controls. Methods Volumetric BMD and microarchitecture were evaluated by high‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR‐pQCT), and areal BMD by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). Differences between groups were significant for p < .05. Results All TIO subjects were healthy until the development of diffuse bone pain and multiple skeletal fractures and deformities. At baseline, sPi and TmPi/GFR were low and patients were on vitamin D and phosphate replacement at the study. Compared with controls, TIO patients had lower aBMD at lumbar spine and hip, and lower vBMD at trabecular, cortical and entire bone, at distal radius ( R ) and distal tibia ( T ): trabecular vBMD ( R = 118.3 × 177.1; T = 72.3 × 161.3 gHA/cm 3 ); cortical vBMD ( R = 782.3 × 866.5; T = 789.1 × 900.9 gHA/cm 3 ); total region vBMD ( R = 234.5 × 317; T = 167.1 × 295.8 gHA/cm 3 ). Bone microarchitecture was very heterogeneous among patients and significantly different from controls: lower cortical thickness ( R = 0.59 × 0.80; T = 0.90 × 1.31 mm), bone volume‐to‐total volume ratio ( R = 0.09 × 0.14; T = 0.06 × 0.13) and Tb.N ( R = 1.46 × 2.10; T = 0.93 × 1.96 mm −1 ) and also higher Tb.Sp ( R = 0.70 × 0.41; T = 1.28 × 0.45 mm) and Tb.1/N.SD ( R = 0.42 × 0.18; T = 0.87 × 0.20 mm). Conclusion In this original study of TIO patients, DXA and HR‐pQCT evaluation identified lower areal and volumetric BMD and severely impaired microarchitecture at cortical and trabecular bones, which probably contribute to bone fragility and fractures.