Quality not quantity for transglutaminase antibody 2: the performance of an endomysial and tissue transglutaminase test in screening coeliac disease remains stable over time
Author(s) -
Swallow K.,
Wild G.,
Sargur R.,
Sanders D. S.,
Aziz I.,
Hopper A. D.,
Egner W.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
clinical & experimental immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.329
H-Index - 135
eISSN - 1365-2249
pISSN - 0009-9104
DOI - 10.1111/cei.12000
Subject(s) - tissue transglutaminase , medicine , coeliac disease , nice , hepatology , immunology , immunoassay , antibody , test (biology) , disease , biology , enzyme , paleontology , biochemistry , computer science , programming language
Summary National Institute of Clinical Excellence ( NICE) and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition ( ESPGHAN) guidance for the diagnosis of coeliac disease has been published. However, there is some controversy regarding the advice on the use of stratifying levels of immunoglobulin ( IgA) tissue transglutaminase antibody ( TG 2) test positivity in the absence of test standardization and the vagueness of the indication to test equivocal samples. Using repeat service audit, we demonstrate that a combination of TG 2 followed by IgA endomysial antibodies ( EMA ) is the best strategy for all degrees of mucosal abnormality using our test combination. Reliance upon immunoassay titre is not as effective, and cannot be applied consistently across populations in the absence of assay standardization. Guidelines advocating the use of tests should involve experts in laboratory diagnostics and external quality assurance to ensure that errors of generalization do not occur and that test performance is achievable in routine diagnostic use.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom