Premium
Triggers of breathlessness in inducible laryngeal obstruction and asthma
Author(s) -
Haines Jemma,
Chua Sarah H. K.,
Smith Jacky,
Slinger Claire,
Simpson Andrew J.,
Fowler Stephen J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical and experimental allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.462
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2222
pISSN - 0954-7894
DOI - 10.1111/cea.13715
Subject(s) - asthma , medicine , cohort , prospective cohort study , pediatrics , swallowing , physical therapy , surgery
Background Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) is often misdiagnosed as, or may coexist with, asthma. Identifying differences in triggering factors may assist clinicians to differentiate between the two conditions and could give mechanistic insights. Objective To identify and compare patient‐reported triggers in ILO and asthma. Methods This was a two‐part study. Initially, we conducted a retrospective case note review of the triggers of ILO from endoscopically confirmed ILO patients to generate a Breathlessness Triggers Survey (BrTS). Triggers were categorized as scents, environmental factors, temperature, emotions, mechanical factors and daily activities. Secondly, ILO and/or asthma patients completed the BrTS prospectively, rating the likelihood of each item triggering their symptoms using a five‐point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Chi‐square testing was performed to compare responses by cohort. Results Data from 202 patients with ILO [73% female, mean (SD) age 53(16) years] were included in the case note review. For the prospective study, 38 patients with ILO only [63% females, age 57(16) years], 39 patients with asthma only [(56% female, age 53(13) years] and 12 patients with both ILO and asthma [83% female, mean age, 57 (14) years)] completed the BrTS. The triggers identified in the case note review were confirmed in the independent sample of patients with ILO and/or asthma and identified several difference in prevalence of the triggers between disease types. Mechanical factors (talking [ P < .001], shouting [ P = .007] and swallowing [ P = .002]) were more common in the ILO cohort compared to patients with asthma. Environmental factors (pollen/flowers [ P = .005] and damp air [ P = .012]) were more common in asthma. There were no differences between groups in frequency of reporting scents as triggers (except for vinegar, more common in ILO, P = .019), temperature, emotions or daily activities. Conclusion There were notable differences between patient‐reported triggers of ILO and asthma, which may support clinician differential diagnosis.