Premium
Caregiver creation of participation‐focused care plans using Participation and Environment Measure Plus (PEM+), an electronic health tool for family‐centred care
Author(s) -
Bosak Dianna L.,
Jarvis Jessica M.,
Khetani Mary A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/cch.12709
Subject(s) - rehabilitation , plan (archaeology) , nursing , best practice , medicine , health care , psychology , physical therapy , archaeology , economic growth , economics , history , management
Abstract Background Family‐centred care (FCC) is a model for rehabilitation practice that focuses on collaborative partnerships between providers and clients (i.e., children and their caregivers). FCC is a best‐practice standard and is expected to yield better outcomes for children and greater caregiver satisfaction with rehabilitation services. A commonly cited barrier to implementing FCC is perceptions about caregiver capability to contribute to designing an initial plan of care, due to lack of skill and/or interest. Objectives The aim of this study is to address FCC barriers through three objectives: (a) report the proportion of caregivers that created multiple care plans using PEM+, an electronic health tool, (b) assess the proportion of caregivers that created complete and participation‐focused care plan(s) and that exceeded criteria of a complete plan, and (c) describe characteristics of caregivers that did not create a complete care plan. Methods Study objectives were addressed via secondary analyses of a subset of data from the PEM + pilot trial. Participants were caregivers ( N = 18) of children with developmental disabilities (aged 0–5 years) receiving rehabilitation services in an early childhood programme. A deductive analytic approach was used to code care plan content to criteria and to determine proportion of caregivers with a complete and participation‐focused care plan and those that exceeded the criteria. Results Multiple care plans were created by 72% of the caregivers, 83% caregivers created at least one care plan that was complete and participation‐focused per criteria, and 83% exceeded the criteria. Conclusion The high occurrence of caregivers who developed multiple care plans and who developed high‐quality care plans, in their completeness and participation‐focused features, suggests that caregivers are interested and capable of participating in a collaborative goal setting process when using PEM+. This indicates that FCC is feasible to implement in clinical workflow with the use of an electronic health tool, which may better facilitate such care. PEM+ warrants further efficacy testing prior to implementation.