
Low‐carbohydrate diet and risk of cancer incidence: The Japan Public Health Center‐based prospective study
Author(s) -
Cai Honglin,
Sobue Tomotaka,
Kitamura Tetsuhisa,
Ishihara Junko,
Nanri Akiko,
Mizoue Tetsuya,
Iwasaki Motoki,
Yamaji Taiki,
Inoue Manami,
Tsugane Shoichiro,
Sawada Norie
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
cancer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1349-7006
pISSN - 1347-9032
DOI - 10.1111/cas.15215
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , colorectal cancer , prospective cohort study , lung cancer , cancer , incidence (geometry) , proportional hazards model , confidence interval , cohort study , population , cohort , european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition , environmental health , physics , optics
Epidemiological evidence on the effects of a long‐term low‐carbohydrate diet (LCD) on cancer incidence remains sparse. We investigate the association between LCD and the risk of overall and specific cancer site incidence in a Japanese population‐based prospective cohort study among 90 171 participants aged 45‐74. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During a median 17.0 y of follow‐up, we identified 15 203 cancer cases. A higher overall LCD score was associated with increased overall cancer risk (HR = 1.08 [CI: 1.02‐1.14], P ‐trend = .012), while it was associated with decreased gastric cancer (GC) risk (0.81 [0.71‐0.93], P ‐trend = .006). A higher animal‐based LCD score was associated with higher risk of overall cancer (1.08 [1.02‐1.14], P ‐trend = .003), colorectal cancer (CRC) (1.11 [0.98‐1.25], P ‐trend = .018), rectal cancer (RC) (1.24 [1.00‐1.54], P ‐trend = .025), lung cancer (LC) (1.16 [1.00‐1.34], P ‐trend = .042), and lower risk of GC (0.90 [0.79‐1.01], P ‐trend = .033). Furthermore, we found that plant‐based LCD score was related to lower GC incidence (0.87 [0.77‐0.99], P ‐trend = .031). Additionally, adjusted for plant fat intake amplified the adverse associations (overall cancer: 1.08 [1.02‐1.14] vs. 1.11 [1.05‐1.18]; CRC: 1.08 [0.95‐1.22] vs. 1.13 [0.99‐1.30]; LC: 1.14 [0.98‐1.33] vs. 1.19 [1.01‐1.41]). We conclude that LCD enriching with animal products was associated with increased overall cancer, CRC, and LC incidence. These adverse associations could be attenuated by plant fat consumption. LCD reduces the risk of developing GC. Long‐term adherence to LCD without paying attention to the balance between animal and plant food source consumption might cause adverse overall cancer incidence consequences.