
Linkage of E2F1 transcriptional network and cell proliferation with respiratory chain activity in breast cancer cells
Author(s) -
Mori Kazunori,
Uchida Tetsu,
Fukumura Motonori,
Tamiya Shigetoshi,
Higurashi Masato,
Sakai Hirosato,
Ishikawa Fumihiro,
Shibanuma Motoko
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cancer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1349-7006
pISSN - 1347-9032
DOI - 10.1111/cas.12953
Subject(s) - biology , cell cycle , cell growth , e2f1 , carcinogenesis , downregulation and upregulation , microbiology and biotechnology , mitochondrion , respiratory chain , mitochondrial respiratory chain , cancer research , tumor progression , cell , cancer , genetics , gene
Mitochondria are multifunctional organelles; they have been implicated in various aspects of tumorigenesis. In this study, we investigated a novel role of the basal electron transport chain (ETC) activity in cell proliferation by inhibiting mitochondrial replication and transcription (mtR/T) using pharmacological and genetic interventions, which depleted mitochondrial DNA/RNA, thereby inducing ETC deficiency. Interestingly, mtR/T inhibition did not decrease ATP levels despite deficiency in ETC activity in different cell types, including MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cells, but it severely impeded cell cycle progression, specifically progression during G2 and/or M phases in the cancer cells. Under these conditions, the expression of a group of cell cycle regulators was downregulated without affecting the growth signaling pathway. Further analysis suggested that the transcriptional network organized by E2F1 was significantly affected because of the downregulation of E2F1 in response to ETC deficiency, which eventually resulted in the suppression of cell proliferation. Thus, in this study, the E2F1‐mediated ETC‐dependent mechanism has emerged as the regulatory mechanism of cell cycle progression. In addition to E2F1, FOXM1 and BMYB were also downregulated, which contributed specifically to the defects in G2 and/or M phase progression. Thus, ETC‐deficient cancer cells lost their growing ability, including their tumorigenic potential in vivo . ETC deficiency abolished the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the mitochondria and a mitochondria‐targeted antioxidant mimicked the deficiency, thereby suggesting that ETC activity signaled through ROS production. In conclusion, this novel coupling between ETC activity and cell cycle progression may be an important mechanism for coordinating cell proliferation and metabolism.