z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative study of one‐step nucleic acid amplification assay, frozen section, and touch imprint cytology for intraoperative assessment of breast sentinel lymph node in C hinese patients
Author(s) -
Wang Yongsheng,
Ouyang Tao,
Wu Jiong,
Liu Yanhui,
Cao Xuchen,
Sun Xiao,
Fu Li,
Liao Ning,
Yang Wentao,
Zhong Weixia,
Lu Aiping
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cancer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1349-7006
pISSN - 1347-9032
DOI - 10.1111/cas.12001
Subject(s) - medicine , frozen section procedure , breast cancer , cytology , sentinel lymph node , histology , lymph node , lymph , sentinel node , pathology , nuclear medicine , cancer
Conventional procedures for the intraoperative assessment of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes ( SLN s) are frozen section ( FS ) and touch imprint cytology ( TIC ). The one‐step nucleic acid amplification ( OSNA ) assay is a novel molecular technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal approach by comparing OSNA assay, FS , and TIC . Five hundred and fifty‐two consecutive patients were enroled from five study centers in C hina. The SLN s were cut into alternating 2 mm blocks. The odd blocks were tested by the OSNA assay intraoperatively, and the even ones were assessed by postoperative histology (four 4‐ to 6‐μm‐thick sections were taken every 200 μm per block). In addition, intraoperative histological assessments were carried out on the even blocks of 211 patients by FS and all blocks of 552 patients by TIC . Overall performance of the assay compared to postoperative histology was: accuracy 91.4%; sensitivity 83.7%; and specificity 92.9%. The sensitivity of the assay was higher than FS (211 patients, 77.6% vs 69.7%; not significant, P  = 0.286) and was significantly higher than TIC (552 patients, 83.6% vs 76.2%; P  = 0.044). When assessing nodes with micrometastases, the sensitivity of the assay was higher than FS (17 nodes, 47.1% vs 23.5%; not significant, P  = 0.289) and was significantly higher than TIC (48 nodes, 62.5% vs 35.4%; P  = 0.007). The study indicated that the OSNA assay is an accurate and rapid intraoperative assay for assessing breast SLN s and it can replace FS and TIC for application in general medical practice. The trial was registered as: OSNA assay C hina R egistration S tudy. Clinical trial registration number: C hina B reast C ancer C linical S tudy G roup 001c.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here