Premium
Review: The effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents with depression – a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Duffy Fiona,
Sharpe Helen,
Schwannauer Matthias
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
child and adolescent mental health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.912
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1475-3588
pISSN - 1475-357X
DOI - 10.1111/camh.12342
Subject(s) - interpersonal psychotherapy , meta analysis , psychological intervention , depression (economics) , randomized controlled trial , interpersonal communication , clinical psychology , psychology , intervention (counseling) , psychotherapist , systematic review , psychiatry , medline , medicine , social psychology , economics , macroeconomics , political science , law
Background Interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents (IPT‐A) is a manualised, time‐limited intervention for young people with depression. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of IPT‐A for treating adolescent depression. Method A systematic search of relevant electronic databases and study reference lists was conducted. Any study investigating the effectiveness of IPT‐A in 12‐ to 20‐year‐olds with a depressive disorder was eligible. Synthesis was via narrative summary and meta‐analysis. Results Twenty studies were identified (10 randomised trials and 10 open trials/case studies), many of which had small sample sizes and were of varying quality. Following IPT‐A, participants experienced large improvements in depression symptoms ( d = −1.48, p < .0001, k = 17), interpersonal difficulties with a medium effect ( d = −0.68, p < .001, k = 8) and in general functioning with a very large effect ( d = 2.85, p < .001, k = 8). When compared against control interventions, IPT‐A was more effective than non‐CBT active controls in reducing depression symptoms ( d = −0.64, p < .001, k = 5) and was no different from CBT ( d = 0.05, p = .88, k = 2). There was no difference between IPT‐A and active control interventions in reducing interpersonal difficulties ( d = −0.26, p = .25, k = 5). Conclusions Interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents is an effective intervention for adolescent depression, improving a range of relevant outcomes. IPT‐A is consistently superior to less structured interventions and performs similarly to CBT. However, these conclusions are cautious, as they are based on a small number of controlled studies, with minor adaptations to the standard IPT‐A protocol, and/or were conducted by the intervention developers. Further robust RCTs are therefore required. The lack of superiority in IPT‐A for improving interpersonal difficulties highlights a need for studies to explore the underpinning mechanisms of change.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom